Customizable system for creating supervisory process control and manufacturing information applications

ABSTRACT

An extensible base process control and manufacturing information application development and execution software suite is disclosed that facilitates streamlined third party (e.g., OEM) development of derivative applications for particular vertical markets. The suite includes an object design toolkit that provides object template derivation tools for accessing and editing a set of base object templates. The objects derivable from the base templates include at least application objects deployed upon lower level hosting component objects of a supervisory process control and manufacturing information application. The toolkit also includes development tools for creating new base object templates that are added as extensions of the set of base object templates. 
     In addition to the toolkit, the suite includes a set of marketing package customization tools facilitating seamlessly integrating changes by developers to the extensible base development and execution software suite. The marketing package customization tools include electronically editable base user documentation.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority of,co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/179,133, filed on Jun.24, 2002, entitled “A Customizable System For Creating SupervisoryProcess Control and Manufacturing Information Applications,” which inturn claims priority of Resnick et al. U.S. provisional application Ser.No. 60/300,363 filed on Jun. 22, 2001, entitled “An Object-basedArchitecture for Executing Supervisory Process Control and ManufacturingApplications,” and Resnick et al. U.S. provisional application Ser. No.60/300,157 filed on Jun. 22, 2001, entitled “Method and System forEnhancing Engineering Productivity in Developing Supervisory Control andManufacturing Information Applications,” and Resnick et al. U.S.provisional application Ser. No. 60/300,393, filed on Jun. 22, 2001,entitled “A Customizable System For Creating Supervisory Process Controland Manufacturing Information Applications.” The contents of each aboveidentified provisional application are expressly incorporated herein byreference in their entirety including the contents and teachings of anyreferences contained, therein.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,456 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,813,587) by McIntyre et al.,entitled “Remotely Monitoring/Diagnosing Distributed Components Of ASupervisory Process Control And Manufacturing Information ApplicationFrom A Central Location,” filed on Jun. 24, 2002.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/974,361, McIntyre et al., entitled “RemotelyMonitoring/Diagnosing Distributed Components Of A Supervisory ProcessControl And Manufacturing Information Application From A CentralLocation,” filed on Oct. 27, 2004.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,763 by Resnick et al., entitled “Supervisory Process ControlAnd Manufacturing Information System Application Having An ExtensibleComponent Model,” filed on Jun. 24, 2002.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,668, by Resnick et al., entitled “Supervisory Process ControlAnd Manufacturing Information System Application Having A LayeredArchitecture,” filed on Jun. 24, 2002.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,095, by Resnick et al., entitled “Security Architecture For AProcess Control Platform Executing Applications,” filed on Jun. 24,2002.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,097, by Resnick et al., entitled “Internationalization OfObjects Executable In A Supervisory process Control And ManufacturingInformation System,” filed on Jun. 24, 2002.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,624, by Greg C. Clinton., entitled “Process Control ScriptDevelopment And Execution Facility Supporting Multiple User-sideProgramming Languages,” filed on Jun. 24, 2002.

This application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/179,455, by Rowley et al., entitled “Installing SupervisoryProcess Control And Manufacturing Software From A Remote Location AndMaintaining Configuration Data Links In a Run-Time Environment,” filedon Jun. 24, 2002.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of computerizedprocess control networks. More particularly, the present inventionrelates to supervisory process control and manufacturing informationsystems. Such systems generally execute above a control layer in aprocess control network to provide guidance to lower level controlelements such as, by way of example, programmable logic controllers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Significant advances in industrial process control technology havevastly improved all aspects of factory and plant operation. Before theintroduction of today's modern industrial process control systems,industrial processes were operated/controlled by humans and rudimentarymechanical controls. As a consequence, the complexity and degree ofcontrol over a process was limited by the speed with which one or morepeople could ascertain a present status of various process statevariables, compare the current status to a desired operating level,calculate a corrective action (if needed), and implement a change to acontrol point to affect a change to a state variable.

Improvements to process control technology have enabled vastly largerand more complex industrial processes to be controlled via programmedcontrol processors. Control processors execute control programs thatread process status variables, execute control algorithms based upon thestatus variable data and desired set point information to render outputvalues for the control points in industrial processes. Such controlprocessors and programs support a substantially self-running industrialprocess (once set points are established).

Notwithstanding the ability of industrial processes to operate under thecontrol of programmed process controllers at previously established setpoints without intervention, supervisory control and monitoring ofcontrol processors and their associated processes is desirable. Suchoversight is provided by both humans and higher-level control programsat an application/human interface layer of a multilevel process controlnetwork. Such oversight is generally desired to verify proper executionof the controlled process under the lower-level process controllers andto configure the set points of the controlled process.

Manufacturing/process control systems are modified due to changes in theprocess control devices and the processes themselves. Thus, it isimportant in such instances to provide a means for quicklyconfiguring/re-configuring without touching unchanged portions of thesystem. It is also important to provide a means for making such changeswhile minimizing disruptions to the operation of the industrialprocess—e.g., minimizing the time that the process stands idle.

In view of the interest and desirability to continually improvesupervisory process control and manufacturing information systems, thereis a strong desire to not be locked into a single architecture for asupervisory process control and manufacturing information system.Process control systems change, and it is desirable to have higher levelsystems that adapt to such changes regardless of their magnitude.Furthermore, less flexible supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation system offerings require designers of process controlinstallations to take into consideration the long-term requirements ofan application because of the relative inflexibility of the applicationto modifications once it is installed.

However, such application inflexibility is undesirable in theconservative industrial control systems market. The process controlindustry tends to pilot, and often the designers are not fully aware ofthe full extent and form of the automation that will ultimately beincorporated in a final installation. Later in the life of a plant, whennew functionality is added the new control system components leverage ormerge existing systems. In such instances where the process controlsystem has changed significantly, there are advantages to incorporatinga different architecture into the installed supervisory process controlapplication.

Another aspect to a flexible architecture for an supervisory processcontrol and manufacturing information application is the need to enablecustomers to design and the implement on their own, customizedapplications and even the objects that are incorporated into theapplications. The set of various types of systems wherein thesupervisory process control applications are incorporated is virtuallylimitless. A provider of supervisory process control applications cannotpossibly develop all types of objects/components to support everypotential use of the application by customers. Nor can the providerpossibly possess sufficient knowledge of the particular control needs ofeach customer. Thus, customers need to configure (or commission anotherto configure), to a certain extent, their own customized applicationobjects to meet the specific needs of a particular application. Thecustomers are in the best position to know what features they need intheir supervisory level control applications. The challenge to thesupplier of supervisory level application software/systems is to enablethe customers (or third parties) to efficiently and quickly design andimplement customized applications meeting the customers' particularneeds.

Another aspect of the process control and manufacturing informationapplications is the broad spectrum of uses and users. Such systemsimplemented in virtually every form of manufacturing/industrial process.Thus, a single developer cannot possible possess the knowledge andprogrammers/developers needed to provide turnkey or near-turnkey systemsfor all potential customers. As a consequence, a vertical marketdistribution approach is a practical solution to the shortage ofprogrammers to integrate the process control applications intoindustrial process control systems.

In a vertical market approach, third parties (e.g., OEMs) withspecialized knowledge of particular industries take a base developmentand runtime software suite and customize the software for theirparticular vertical markets. The OEMs in effect become value addedcustomers/agents of the base system developer. The OEMs create a marketfor a process control and manufacturing information development/runtimesoftware suite where one otherwise would not exist due to a lack ofsoftware/process control system integration expertise.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with an aspect of the invention, an extensible baseprocess control and manufacturing information application developmentand execution software suite for developers that facilitates third party(e.g., OEM) development of derivative applications for particularvertical markets. The suite includes an object design toolkit thatprovides object template derivation tools for accessing and editing aset of base object templates. The objects derivable from the basetemplates include at least application objects deployed upon lower levelhosting component objects of a supervisory process control andmanufacturing information application. The toolkit also includesdevelopment tools for creating new base object templates that are addedas extensions of the set of base object templates.

In addition to the toolkit, the suite includes a set of marketingpackage customization tools facilitating seamlessly integrating changesby developers to the extensible base development and execution softwaresuite. The marketing package customization tools include electronicallyeditable base user documentation. The electronically editable nature ofthe documentation facilitates supplementation in accordance withmodifications by developers to the extensible base development andexecution software package. Thus, the developers are able to provideenhanced product offering derived from the base suite withoutreplicating the effort that was expended to render the base suite.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method fordistributing a supervisory process control and manufacturing informationapplication development and execution software suite throughintermediate development houses comprises a set of steps involving theconcerted effort of a primary developer and secondary developers. Themethod comprising the step of first distributing, to independentdevelopers, an extensible base development and execution software suite.The independent developers create an extended version of the basedevelopment and execution software suite. The new software componentsinclude at least new object templates. Thereafter, the independentdevelopers distribute the extended version of the base development andexecution software package.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The appended claims set forth the features of the present invention withparticularity. The invention, together with its objects and advantages,may be best understood from the following detailed description taken inconjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary supervisory processcontrol network including a multi-layered supervisory process controland manufacturing information application;

FIG. 2 depicts a multi-tiered object arrangement for an application;

FIG. 3 depicts a set of attributes associated with a common portion forthe objects comprising the application;

FIG. 4 depicts a set of attributes associated with a platform-specificportion of a platform object;

FIG. 5 depicts a set of attributes associated with an engine object;

FIG. 6 depicts a set of attributes associated with a scheduler object;

FIG. 7 depicts a set of attributes associated with an exemplaryapplication object;

FIG. 8 is a sequence diagram summarizing a set of steps performed tostart up a multi-layered application embodying the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a sequence diagram summarizing a set of steps for moving anobject to another engine in a network comprising multiple applicationengines;

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram depicting controlled components of asimple plant process;

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram depicting the simple plant processcomponents logically grouped into areas.

FIG. 12 is a hierarchical tree structure depicting the grouping of areasin the plant arrangement of FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a hierarchical tree structure representing the derivationrelationships of objects of a supervisory process control applicationassociated with the plant process depicted in FIG. 10;

FIG. 14 a is a schematic drawing of a mixer vessel portion of the plantprocess depicted in FIG. 10;

FIG. 14 b is a hierarchical model view depicting the containmentrelationship of a MixerVessel compound application object templatecorresponding to the mixer vessel depicted in FIG. 14;

FIG. 15 is a hierarchical tree structure representing a derivationstructure for portions of the application associated with the hardwareof a system (e.g., platforms, engines, and device integration objects);

FIG. 16 is a hierarchical tree structure presenting a model view ofapplication object arrangement including the areas with which theapplication objects are associated;

FIG. 17 is a hierarchical tree structure presenting a deployment view ofthe application to a set of computer devices represented by identifiedplatform objects at the top level of the hierarchy;

FIG. 18 is an exemplary graphical user interface depicting a set oftemplates available to a developer to create an application;

FIG. 19 is a block diagram depicting components and their relations inan exemplary application object template structure;

FIG. 20 is a block diagram depicting interfaces, components, andutilities that provide the functionality of a toolkit in accordance withan embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 21 is an exemplary flowchart summarizing a set of steps performedto create a new application object template in accordance with anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 22 summarizes a set of extensible components facilitating thirdparty development of enhancements to a base development and executionsuite; and

FIG. 23 is a flow diagram depicting the stages of adevelopment/marketing/distribution method that includes enhancements toa base application development and execution suite utilizing particularvertical market knowledge of third party developers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

In view of the shortcomings of known supervisory process controlapplications with regard to adapting to changed process control systemarchitectures, a supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation system application architecture is described that offersusers the freedom to re-architect (e.g., augment, reconfigure, etc.)such applications, with minimal impact on the existing, underlying,process control system engineering. In particular, the disclosed systemarchitecture, described by way of example herein, comprises multiplelayers wherein each underlying layer exhibits a hosting relationship toa next higher layer. It is noted however, that such hosting relationshipdoes not extend to communications, and thus communications to/from ahosted layer need not pass through its host. In accordance with thedisclosed layered application architecture, an application object ishosted by an engine. The engine is hosted by a platform that correspondsto, for example, a personal computer with infrastructure software. Theintermediate engine layer abstracts the application object from theplatform architecture. Thus, location within a physical systemcontaining the application object need not be addressed by theapplication object.

One aspect of the disclosed supervisory process control andmanufacturing information application is an object hierarchy that freeshigh level application objects of design constraints associated with thecomputing system hardware upon which the application objects reside. Inparticular, the objects associated with a supervisory process controlapplication environment are arranged on physical computing devices in ahierarchy comprising a plurality of layers. Application objects executeat an application layer. The application objects are hosted by an engineobject at a middle layer. The engine objects are hosted by a platformobject that resides at the lowest of the three layers. Each platformobject, launched by a bootstrap object at yet an even lower layer. Theplatform object corresponds a physical computing system (including anoperating system) upon which application and engine objects execute.Thus, application objects need only establish a proper, standardized,relationship to a hosting application engine object. Aspects of thesupervisory control and manufacturing information system relating tophysical computing devices and their operating systems are handled bythe engine and platform object configuration. The physical topology ofthe system and the application's physical location is transparent to theoperation of the application objects.

The disclosed layered hosting arrangement of object enables asupervisory process control application to be modeled independently ofthe computing hardware and supervisory control network topology, uponwhich the application executes. Isolating the application model from thephysical deployment configuration enables migrating applications tonew/different computing systems as the need arises and to keep up withunderlying hardware changes over the course of the life of theapplication. Such capabilities are especially beneficial in the area ofprocess control and manufacturing information systems where pilotinstallations are used to provide proof of concept and then theapplication grows as, and when, it is justified.

The application model includes groupings of application objects withinlogical containers referred to as “areas.” All application objectswithin a same area must be deployed upon a same application engineaccording to a software deployment scheme. However, the layeredapplication architecture enables binding an application model to aparticular deployment model at a late stage in development. Thus, anabstract “area” need not be associated with a particular engine until adeveloper is ready to deploy and execute a supervisory-level system.

The security model for a supervisory control and manufacturinginformation system is independent of the physical hardware, and thus asupervisory process control and manufacturing information systemarchitect need not bind security to a particular physical systemcomponent until the application modules have been deployed within aphysical system containing the physical system component. The latebinding of security to particular components of a system enables adeveloper to determine the authorization of a particular system basedupon the deployed application objects, and the developer binds securitybased upon the functionality of the application objects deployed uponparticular computing nodes.

Furthermore, disassociating the functionality (business logic) providedby the application objects from the computer systems upon which theexecute enables presenting the defined system/software configurationaccording to a plurality of views/models. A “plant centric” applicationmodel enables a system developer to build an application model in alogical way. The system developer defines the individual devices andfunctions as distinct entities within a plant. All associatedfunctionality is contained in each object. After defining the individualobjects within the plant, the user configures (assembles) associationsbetween the objects.

The application model is a logical build of the plant relative tophysical areas of the plant and the equipment and functions within thephysical areas. The engineer configures the behavior and associationbetween these plant area entities. The supervisory process control andmanufacturing information system provides a configuration view of theapplication model depicting a containment hierarchy with relation to:the areas and equipment, and the equipment itself.

The application model supports containing objects within objects, andcontainment can be specified in a template. Containment facilitatesleveraging the work of different engineers at different levels ofdevelopment of a supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation application. A particular technician can define the detailsfor a particular low level device. Thereafter another engineer defines aunit or other device in the application that contains one or moreinstances of the particular low level device.

The application model also supports propagating changes throughinheritance. Thus, child objects inherit changes to a referenced parenttemplate definition.

After a developer specifies the functionality of a process control andmanufacturing information application, the application is deployedacross potentially many physical computing systems. In an embodiment ofthe invention disclosed herein, a second type of system view, referredto as a deployment model, enables a user to configure physical PCs anddevices with regard to an application. The deployment model defines: PCsand engine types that run on the platforms, and external deviceintegration. A user defines the areas that will run on particularengines, thereby determining where the particular application softwarewill be physically executed. The supervisory process control andmanufacturing information system provides a configuration view of adeployment model showing the hierarchy with physical PCs, and the areasand application objects running on the physical PCs. After a developerdesignates/confirms the deployment model, the application objects andengine objects are deployed on the physical computing devices accordingto the deployment model.

Other aspects of an embodiment of an application embodying the presentrelate to the manner in which it is developed. In particular, ratherthan programming an application from scratch. The supervisory processcontrol and manufacturing information application is developed using aset of provided tools, templates, configuration interfaces and automatedcode generators. In particular, an exemplary application developmentenvironment includes templates and the ability to build objects from thetemplates. Instances are then created from the created objects. Thus,developers import a particular object template from a library ofstandard templates as a starting point for an application developmentproject. Using the templates, application developers duplicatepreviously created objects inside of a project.

Another feature of the development environment is the ability of thirdparties to develop custom templates using template development toolkits.The customized templates are then integrated into the developmentenvironment. The toolkits provide the basic required functionality forparticular types of objects. The third parties define additionalfunctionality that augments the base functionality supplied by thetoolkits.

Yet another feature of the development environment is themulti-functionality of the developed objects. In particular, a userdevelops/configures a single unit (object). However, the single unitsupports a variety of environments including: an editor environment, apackage management environment, and a runtime environment.

Another aspect of the template architecture is the incorporation ofgraphics into the templates. Thus, the graphic/symbol of an object is apart of the object. The graphical attributes of the object follow theobject and can be inherited by templates derived from the template.

The disclosed system also possesses a combination of developmentenvironment features that enhance the ability of other developers (e.g.,original equipment manufacturers or “OEMs”) to create their own versionsof a development and execution framework for end users. In general, thearchitecture of the disclosed system enables companies to augment theoriginal system (comprising a base set of templates, primitives andtoolkits and an underlying support structure) with the OEMs' owndesigned based templates, developed with the aid of the base set oftemplates, primitives and the toolkits. The OEMs then market anddistribute the resulting augmented system as a product to customers inthe same way that the base system is marketed to customers. Theextensible nature of templates, re-usable primitives, and toolkits,encourage customized development of new templates, objects, andfunctionality, thereby broadening the spectrum of potential users of thesystem.

In an embodiment of the invention, the documentation is editable bythird party developers enabling them to build their enhancements intothe original documentation rather than starting from scratch. Thus, theoriginal and third party application documentation is merged into one,and then run through style sheets to provide help, and online manuals ina seamless format.

Furthermore, the provided system allows editing of the installprocesses. Thus, users are capable of customizing the install userinterface and directories so that a third party developer can add theirown startup screens and install sequences.

In addition, all the configuration activities, usually performed by theIntegrated Development Environment (IDE) have been exposed via a toolkitto enable an OEM to totally customize the configuration environment tofit their specific vertical market.

Other customization features directed to OEM developers of the basesoftware suite include not only adding new functionality, but alsoversioning the new offerings such that the OEMs can control theresulting offerings as though they were the originators of the system.

Having summarized generally the new architecture for a supervisoryprocess control and manufacturing information system facilitatingre-configuring (re-architecting) the system, attention is directed toFIG. 1, comprising an illustrative example of a system incorporating anapplication architecture embodying the present invention. A firstapplication server personal computer (PC) 100 and a second applicationserver PC 102 collectively and cooperatively execute a distributedmulti-layered supervisory process control and manufacturing informationapplication comprising a first portion 104 and second portion 106. Theapplication portions 104 and 106 include device integration applicationobjects PLC1Network and PLC1, and PLC2Network and PLC2, respectively.The PLCxNetwork device integration objects facilitate configuration of adata access server (e.g., OPC DAServers 116 and 118). The PLC1 and PLC2device integration objects, operating as OPC clients, access datalocations within the buffers of the OPC DAServers 116 and 118. The dataaccess servers 116 and 118 and the device integration objectscooperatively import and buffer data from external process controlcomponents such as PLCs or other field devices. The data buffers areaccessed by a variety of application objects 105 and 107 executing uponthe personal computers 100 and 102. Examples of application objectsinclude, by way of example, discrete devices, analog devices, fieldreferences, etc.

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, applicationengines host the application objects (via a logical grouping objectreferred to herein as an “area”. The engines are in turn hosted byplatform objects at the next lower level of the supervisory processcontrol and manufacturing information application. The applicationportions 104 and 106 are, in turn hosted by generic bootstrap components108 and 110. All of the aforementioned components are described hereinbelow with reference to FIG. 2.

In the exemplary system embodying the present invention, themulti-layered application comprising portions 104 and 106 iscommunicatively linked to a controlled process. In particular, the firstapplication server personal computer 100 is communicatively coupled to afirst programmable logic controller 112, and the second applicationserver personal computer 102 is communicatively coupled to a secondprogrammable logic controller 114. It is noted that the depictedconnections from the PCs 100 and 102 to the PLCs 112 and 114 representlogical connections. Such logical connections correspond to both directand indirect physical communication links. For example, in a particularembodiment, the PLC 112 and PLC 114 comprise nodes on an Ethernet LAN towhich the personal computers 100 and 104 are also connected. In otherembodiments, the PLCs 112 and 114 are linked directly to physicalcommunication ports on the PCs 100 and 102.

In the illustrative embodiment set forth in FIG. 1, the PCs 100 and 102execute data access servers 116 and 118 respectively. The data accessservers 116 and 118 obtain/extract process information rendered by thePLC's 112 and 114 and provide the process information to applicationobjects (e.g., PLC1Network, PLC1, PLC2Network, PLC2) of the applicationcomprising portions 104 and 106. The data access servers 116 and 118are, by way of example, OPC Servers. However, those skilled in the artwill readily appreciate the wide variety of custom and standardized dataformats/protocols that are potentially carried out by the data accessservers 116 and 118. Furthermore, the exemplary application objects,through connections to the data access servers 116 and 118, represent aPLC network and the operation of the PLC itself. However, theapplication objects comprise a virtually limitless spectrum of classesof executable objects that perform desired supervisory control and dataacquisition/integration functions in the context of the supervisoryprocess control and manufacturing information application.

The supervisory process control and management information applicationis augmented, for example, by a configuration personal computer 120 thatexecutes a database (e.g., SQL) server 122 that maintains a supervisoryprocess control and management information application configurationdatabase 124 for the application objects and other related informationincluding templates from which the application objects are rendered. Theconfiguration database 124 also includes a global name table 125 thatfacilitates binding location independent object names tolocation-derived handles facilitating routing messages between objectswithin the system depicted in FIG. 1. The configuration PC 120 andassociated database server 122 support: administrative monitoring for amulti-user environment, revision history management, centralized licensemanagement, centralized object deployment including deployment andinstallation of new objects and their associated software, maintenanceof the global name table 125, and importing/exporting object templatesand instances.

Actual configuration of the applications is carried out via anIntegrated Development Environment (IDE) 127 that communicates with thedatabase server 122 via distributed component object model (DCOM)protocols. The IDE is a utility from which application objects areconfigured and deployed to the application server PCs 100 and 102.Developers of a supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation application, through the IDE, carry out a wide variety ofsystem design functions including: importing new object and templatetypes, configuring new templates from existing templates, defining newapplication objects, and deploying the application objects to the hostapplication engines (AppEngine1 or AppEngine2 in FIG. 1) on theapplication server PCs 100 and 102.

The exemplary supervisory control network environment depicted in FIG.1, also includes a set of operator stations 130, 132, and 134 thatprovide a view into a process or portion thereof, monitored/controlledby the supervisory process control and management informationapplication installed and executing as a set of layered objects upon thePCs 100 and 102. A RawMaterial PC 130 provides a representative viewenabling monitoring a raw materials area of a supervised industrialprocess. A ProductionPC 132 presents a representative view of aproduction portion of the supervised industrial process. AFinishedProductPC 134 provides a representative view of an area of aproduction facility associated with finished product. Each one of theoperator stations 130, 132, and 134 includes a bootstrap host for eachof the particular operator station platforms. Each one of the operatorstations 130, 132, and 134 includes a view engine that process graphicsinformation to render a graphical depiction of the observed industrialprocess or portion thereof.

It is noted that the system depicted in FIG. 1 and described hereinaboveis merely an example of a multi-layered hierarchical architecture for asupervisory process control and manufacturing information system. Thepresent invention is not limited to the particular disclosedapplication/system. For example it is contemplated that themulti-layered application approach is applicable, at a lower controllevel, to a distributed control system (DCS) application or aprogrammable logic controller (PLC) application. In these cases specificplatform and application engine objects are developed for the uniquecomputing hardware within the DCS or PLC. It is further noted that FIG.1 is presented as a logical view of the interrelations between installedsoftware and physical computing hardware and is not intended todesignate any particular network topology. Rather the present inventionis suitable for a virtually any network topology. In fact, the presentinvention is applicable to a control application running on a singlecomputer system linked to a controlled process.

Turning now to FIG. 2, a class diagram depicts the hierarchicalarrangement of layered software associated with a computer executing atleast of portion of a supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation application. Each computer executes an operating system 200,such as MICROSOFT's WINDOWS at a lowest level of the hierarchy. Theoperating system 200, hosts a bootstrap object 202. The bootstrap object202 is loaded onto a computer and activated in association with startupprocedures executed by the operating system 200. As the host of aplatform class object 204, the bootstrap object 202 must be activatedbefore initiating operation of the platform class object 204. Thebootstrap object 202 starts and stops the platform class object. Thebootstrap object 202 also renders services utilized by the platformclass object 204 to start and stop one or more engine objects 206 hostedby the platform class object 204.

The platform class object 204 is host to one or more engine objects 206.In an embodiment of the invention, the platform class object 204represents, to the one or more engine objects 206, a computer executinga particular operating system. The platform class object 204 maintains alist of the engine objects 206 deployed on the platform class object204, starts and stops the engine objects 206, and restarts the engineobjects 206 if they crash. The platform class object 204 monitors therunning state of the engine objects 206 and publishes the stateinformation to clients. The platform class object 204 includes a systemmanagement console diagnostic utility that enables performing diagnosticand administrative tasks on the computer system executing the platformclass object 204. The platform class object 204 also provides alarms toa distributed alarm subsystem.

The engine objects 206 host a set of application objects 210 thatimplement supervisory process control and/or manufacturing informationacquisition functions associated with an application. The engine objects206 initiate startup of all application objects 210. The engine objects206 also schedule execution of the application objects 210 with regardto one another with the help of a scheduler object. Engines registerapplication objects with a scheduler for execution. The schedulerexecutes the application objects relative to other application objectsbased upon the configuration specified by an engine. The engine objects206 monitor the operation of the application objects 210 and placemalfunctioning ones in a quarantined state. The engine objects 206support check pointing by saving/restoring changes to a runtimeapplication made by automation objects to a configuration file. Theengine objects 206 maintain a name binding service that bind attributereferences (e.g., tank1.value.pv) to a proper one of the applicationobjects 210.

The engine objects 206 ultimately control how execution of applicationobjects will occur. However, once the engine objects 206 determineexecution scheduling for application objects 210, the real-timescheduling of their execution is controlled by a scheduler 208. Thescheduler supports an interface containing the methodsRegisterAutomationObject( ) and UnregisterAutomationObject( ) enablingengine objects 206 to add/remove particular application objects to/fromthe schedulers list of scheduled operations.

The application objects 210 include a wide variety of objects thatexecute business logic facilitating carrying out a particular processcontrol operation (e.g., turning a pump on, actuating a valve), and/orinformation gathering/management function (e.g., raising an alarm basedupon a received field device output signal value) in the context of, forexample, an industrial process control system. Examples of applicationobjects include: analog input, discrete device, and PID loop. A class ofapplication objects 210, act upon data supplied by process controlsystems, such as PLCs, via device integration objects (e.g., OPCDAServer 118). The function of the integration objects is to provide abridge between process control/manufacturing information sources and thesupervisory process control and manufacturing information application.

The application objects 210, in an exemplary embodiment, include anapplication interface accessed by engine objects and schedulers. Theengine objects access the application object interface to: initialize anapplication object, startup an application object, and shutdown anapplication object. The schedulers use the application object interfaceto initiate a scheduled execution of the application object.

Having described the primary components of the hierarchically arrangedsupervisory process control and manufacturing information application,attention is now directed to FIGS. 3-7 that identify attributes ofprimitives that make up the above-described object structures. Turningfirst to FIG. 3 depicts a common object primitive definition. The commonprimitive is incorporated into all the application objects (i.e.,platform, application engine, scheduler, application, etc.). A scriptsattribute 300 is used to keep track of scripts that are associated withan application object. The scripts attribute 300 includes scriptsinherited from templates as well as scripts created specifically for theparticular object type. A UDA (user defined attribute) attribute 302references inherited and new user defined attributes for an object. Analarm mode attribute 304 indicates whether an alarm is enabled and theextent to which it is enabled. A based on attribute 306 identifies aparticular base template from which an object was derived. Attribute 308stores a string identifying attribute names in an object. A containedname attribute 310 identifies the name assigned to an object within acontainer. For example, an object may correspond to a “level” containedwithin a “reactor” object. A deployed version attribute 312 stores aninteger identifying a version for a deployed object. A derived fromattribute 314 identifies the actual template from which an object wasderived. The contents of the derived from attribute 314 differ from thecontents of the based on attribute 306. The based on attribute 306 isthe base template from which this object was derived from. The derivedattribute 314 is the immediate template from which this object wascreated. For example for a hierarchy of templates as follows:

$DiscreteDevice

-   -   $Pump        -   Pump001            $DiscreteDevice is the base template from which a new            template $Pump is derived. An instance Pump001 is created            from the template $Pump. The attribute “derived from” for            object Pump001 will be $Pump. The attribute “based on” for            object Pump001 will be $DiscreteDevice.

A relative execution order attribute 316 identifies another object withwhich a present object has a relative execution order relation. Inaddition to identifying another object, attribute 316 identifies therelative order of execution of the objects (e.g., none, before, after,etc.). The relative execution order information is utilized to scheduleexecution of application objects. A hierarchical name attribute 318stores a full name for an object including any of the containers of theobject (e.g., Reactor1.level). An IsTemplate attribute 320 indicateswhether the object is a template or an object instantiated from atemplate. An AlarmInhibit attribute 322 within an area or containerobject provides cutout functionality to inhibit alarms for all objectswithin an area or container. An alarm mode attribute 324 specifies thecurrent alarm mode of an object. The mode is based upon the object'scommanded mode if area and container are enabled. Otherwise, the mostdisabled state of the container or parent area applies. Alarm ModeCommand attribute 326 specifies the object's currently commanded alarmmode.

The illustrative example of the present invention supports an objecthierarchy. Objects specify such hierarchy in the context of aplant/model view in an area attribute 328 that specifies an area towhich an object belongs. A container attribute 330 specifies a containerthat contains the object. As previously explained, a hostingrelationship exists among various deployed objects. In particular, aplatform hosts an engine, and an engine (via an area) hosts applicationobjects. Thus, a host attribute 338 identifies an object's host.

A category attribute 332 specifies a class of objects with which theobject is associated, thereby facilitating organizing objects accordingto local associations and/or functionality. The value is one of thecategories named in a category enumeration attribute 334. An errorattribute 336 identifies errors generated by the object. An InAlarm flag340 stores a Boolean flag indicating whether an alarm exists in anobject. The flag is true only if a Scan State flag 342 is true (theobject is on scan) and the object's alarms are enabled. The scan stateof an object is changed through a Scan State Command 344 that signalswhether to take the object on/off scan.

A security group 346 enables designating a particular security group forthe object to limit access/use of the object to particular classes ofusers. A description attribute 348 provides an area to store a shortdescription of an object. A tag name attribute 350 specifies a uniquetag for an object. A warnings attribute 352 lists any warnings renderedby an object.

Having described the common attributes of all objects described herein,a set of object type-specific attributes are described herein belowbeginning with attributes for a platform primitive with reference toFIG. 4. The attributes identified in FIG. 4 relate to supporting theobject/engine/platform hosting hierarchy. While not identified in FIG.4, a set of attributes are provided through the platform primitiveenabling platform objects to monitor/report computer device statistics.Other attributes included in the exemplary platform primitive, but notincluded in FIG. 4, concern detecting and reporting alarms associatedwith computer device statistics and storing the statistics.

A RegisterEngine attribute 400 stores a command to register a newengine. The RegisterEngine attribute 400 is used at deployment time toregister an engine with a host platform. A StartEngine attribute 402stores a command to start a particular deployed engine on the platform.A StartHostedObjects attribute 404 stores a command passed to theplatform to start all hosted engines that are start auto and startsemi-auto type engines. A StopEngine attribute 406 stores a command tostop a particular deployed engine on the platform. An UnRegisterEngineattribute 308 stores a command to un-deploy a previously deployed engineon the platform. An Engines attribute 410 stores a list of all enginesdeployed on the platform. An EngineStates attribute 412 stores a list ofthe current operational states of all engine objects hosted by theplatform.

FIG. 5 summarizes a set of attributes associated with an engineprimitive. An external name attribute 500 stores a string used forexternal reference. An internal name attribute 502 stores a string usedfor internal reference. A reference count attribute 504 stores thenumber of objects referencing the engine object. When the number ofreferences reaches zero, there are no clients, external to the engine,referencing any automation object attributes on the engine. This helpsoperators determine the impact (how many clients will be affected) ofstopping the engine. An object attribute 506 is an array comprising aset of all objects hosted by the engine object. A startup type attribute508 identifies how an engine object will be started (e.g., automatic,semi-automatic, manual). A CanGoOnscan attribute 510 indicates whetheran engine object can be placed on-scan. A BindReference attribute 512 isa command used to resolve references (e.g., pump001.inlet.PV) tohandles. These handles are used to locate objects at runtime by themessaging infrastructure. An AutoRestart attribute 514 stores a Booleanvalue indicating whether the engine object should be automaticallyrestarted upon detection of a failure. A CheckpointFailedAlarm attribute516 stores a value indicating whether a last attempt to checkpointhosted objects had failed during a last attempt. An AlarmThrottleLimitattribute 518 stores a value, in alarms per second raised by an engineobject before throttling of alarms generated by objects on the enginewill occur. An EngineAlarmRate attribute 520 indicates the number ofalarms registered on an engine during a last complete scan. AnAlarmsThrottled attribute 522 indicates that an engine object throttledalarms during the last scan.

A set of attributes is provided to handle script execution. AScriptExecuteTimout attribute 524 stores a time limit for a synchronousscript to complete execution before an alarm is raised by an engineobject. A ScriptStartupTimeout attribute 526 stores a time limit for asynchronous script to startup before an alarm will be raised. AScriptShutdownTimout attribute 528 stores a time limit for a synchronousscript to shutdown before an alarm will be raised. A PublisherHeartbeatattribute 530 stores a value corresponding to the number of seconds anengine object will wait for a heartbeat message from another engineobject before it assumes the engine has failed. A Process Id. 532identifies a unique identification assigned to an engine process.

An engine object also contains a set of command attributes associatedwith managing application objects. A CreateAutomationObject attribute534 is a command attribute for creating an application object. ADeleteAutomationObject attribute 536 is a command attribute for deletingan application object. A StartHostedObjects attribute 538 is a commandattribute for starting hosted application objects.

Turning to FIG. 6, a set of attributes is summarized that are containedwithin a scheduler primitive and are unique to a scheduler object. Eachscheduler object includes internal and external name attributes 600 and602. A StatsAvgPeriod 604 stores a value representing the averagingperiod for the scheduler acquiring statistics stored within theattributes described herein below. A CheckpointPeriodAvg attribute 606identifies the current average of times between checkpoints during thecurrent averaging period. An ExecutionTimeAvg attribute 608 stores avalue representing the amount of time to execute all the objects perscan cycle. A HousekeepingTimeAvg attribute 610 stores a valuecorresponding to the average time per cycle to complete housekeepingoperations. A TimeIdleAvg attribute 612 stores a value representing theaverage idle time per period. A TimeIdleMax attribute 614 stores a valuerepresenting the maximum idle time recorded. A TimeIdleMin attribute 616stores a value representing the minimum idle time recorded. AnInputMsgSizeAvg attribute 618 stores an average input message size overthe averaging period. An InputMsgsProcessedAvg attribute 620 stores avalue representing the total volume of messages processed, in bytes, perscan cycle during the averaging period. An InputMsgsQueuedAvg attribute622 stores the average number of messages queued per scan cycle duringthe averaging period. An InputMsgsQueuedMax attribute 624 stores themaximum average stored in attribute 622 since the last time thestatistics attributes were reset.

An InputQueueSizeMaxAllowed attribute 626 stores the maximum allowedsize of queued messages in a network message exchange input queue. AnInputQueueSizeAvg attribute 628 stores an average size of the inputqueue in bytes during the averaging period. An InputQueueSizeMaxattribute 630 stores the maximum average stored in attribute 628 sincethe last time the statistical attributes were reset.

A TimeInputAvg attribute 632 stores a value representing the averagetime required, during the current period, to process an input message.An ObjectCnt attribute 634 stores a count value corresponding to thecurrent number of application objects currently being handled by ascheduler object. An ObjectsOffScanCnt attribute 636 indicates thenumber of application objects that are currently off-scan. ATimeOutputAvg attribute 638 stores an average amount of time required toprocess output message during a cycle. A StatsReset attribute 640indicates an request to reset the statistical attributes described forthe scheduler that are not regularly reset (e.g., maximum values). AScanCyclesCnt attribute 642 stores a value indicating the number ofcycles since a last resetting of the attributes through the StatsResetattribute 640. A ScanOverrunsCnt attribute 644 indicates the number oftimes, since a last StatsReset, that a scan cycle ended withoutcompleting a scan of all objects. A ScanOverrunsConsecutiveCount 646stores a current number of consecutive cycles where an overrun occurs. AScanOverrunHighLimit attribute 648 stores a high alarm limit forconsecutive overruns to trigger an alarm stored in aScanOverrunCondition attribute 650. A ScanPeriod 652 stores a valuerepresenting the cycle time for the scheduler.

It is noted that the attributes associated with particular object typesare not limited to the particular object primitive types. In fact, allobject types comprise at least two of the above-described primitives.All object types utilize the common object primitive. In addition, aplatform object includes the attributes of the scheduler, engine andplatform primitives described above. An engine object includes theattributes of the scheduler, and the engine primitives.

Turning to FIG. 7, a set of primitives is associated with an applicationobject. Each type of application object has its own set of primitives.The primitives contain the business specific logic and the set ofattributes that are unique to the function of the primitives. Theseprimitives can be reused across different application object types.

An exemplary set of primitives associated with an analog deviceapplication object is depicted in FIG. 7. A primitive 700 labeledAnalogDevice attributes contains a set of analog device specificattributes in which clients would be interested. A PV.Input 701 is aprimitive that reads, via a device integration object (e.g., PLC1), thedata from a field device. A PV.Output 702 is a primitive that writes,via a device integration object, data to the field. A Scaling 703 is aprimitive that performs linear or square root scaling of the data readfrom the input primitive (PV.Input 701). A LevelAlarms 704 is aprimitive that generates alarms if a process variable in theAnalogDevice primitive 700 exceeds or is below configured values. APV.RoC 705 is a primitive that generates alarms if a PV increases ordecreases faster than a preset limit. A SP 706 is a primitive thatclients write to when they want to modify the value to which thePV.Output 702 writes. A PVDev 707 is a primitive that is used togenerate an alarm if a value read in from a field device (via primitive701) deviates from a value written to the field device (via primitive702) by a certain amount. A CtrlTrack 708 is a primitive that is used toenable the setpoint and PV primitives to track changes driven from theexternal device. Having described the basic building blocks of ansupervisory process control and manufacturing information applicationembodying the present invention, attention is directed to a set ofsequence diagrams that summarize methods employed to carry out such anapplication. Turning to FIG. 8, a sequence diagram depicts steps for thestarting and stopping an application embodying a hierarchical hostingrelationship. During stage 800, a bootstrap process on a computer systemissues a start platform request to a loaded platform object. Inresponse, during step 802 the platform process issues a call to thebootstrap interface requesting the bootstrap to start all theapplication engines hosted by the platform object. During stage 804, thebootstrap process creates an application engine object having theattributes discussed hereinabove.

During stage 806, the application engine process starts all of itshosted application objects. The application engine also registers thehosted application objects with a scheduler process during stage 808.Registering an application object adds that application object to theset of application objects that the scheduler scans during each scancycle. At stage 810, the application engine issues a command to thescheduler to begin executing/scanning the started and registeredapplication objects. Thereafter, at stage 812 the scheduler executes theregistered application objects. Such execution is performed periodicallyduring each scan cycle.

The scheduler continues to periodically scan the registered applicationobjects in accordance with a supervisory process control andmanufacturing information system application until receiving a shutdowncommand. In particular, the bootstrap process, during stage 814, issuesa shutdown command to the platform process in response to an operatingsystem shutdown command. During stage 816, the platform process returnsa stop engine command to the bootstrap to commence shutting down allengines hosted by the platform process. In response, during stage 818the bootstrap issues a request to the application engine to stop. Thebootstrap will wait for the application engine to stop. However, after aperiod, if the application engine has not stopped, the bootstrap willrequest the operating system to shut down the application engineprocess.

Under normal operating conditions, during stage 820 the applicationengine issues a command to the scheduler to un-register the engine'shosted application objects. Furthermore, in an embodiment of theinvention, the engine requests to its hosted application objects to shutdown. However, in alternative embodiments of the invention the shutdownrequest is issued by the scheduler in response to the un-registercommand.

It is noted that in the above-described exemplary embodiment, the engineobjects and platform objects communicate with the bootstrap process andhandle aspects of the supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation application relating to physical computing deviceconfigurations upon which the application executes. However, theapplication objects themselves only communicate with the engine andscheduler according to a platform-independent interface. The one or moreengine objects hosting the application objects insulate the applicationobjects from characteristics of the computer systems upon which theapplication objects execute. Thus, the application objects executeindependently of the physical computing device configurations. Theapplication objects, though constrained to execute on a same engine withother application objects designated within a same area, are notconstrained by any requirement to execute upon a particular one ofmultiple capable engines and/or platforms within a system. Thus, movingan area comprising a set of application objects is performed withminimal interruption to the execution of other application objectsrunning on the affected engines.

Turning to FIG. 9, a sequence diagram illustrates the operationalindependence of an application object with regard to its engine objecthost, and the ability to re-deploy an application object upon anotherhost engine. Beginning at stage 900, an engine A issues a start commandto a scheduler A to commence periodic execution/scanning of anapplication object A. During stage 902, the scheduler A periodicallyactivates the application object A to perform its business logic inassociation with an application comprising multiple application objects.

Later, an application engineer decides to migrate the application objectA to an engine B on a different computer platform. One reason to makesuch a change is to reduce computational load on a computer device as asystem grows. The user issues a request to the engine A to removeapplication object A during stage 904. In response, during stage 906 theengine A issues a request to the scheduler A to stop scanning theapplication object A. During stage 908, the engine A issues a command tothe application object A to shut down. The operation of the engine A andscheduler A is otherwise unaffected by the removal of application objectA.

In an embodiment of the invention, the application is spread acrossmultiple computing devices, and each computing device is equipped withthe platform, engine and scheduler objects of the application hierarchythat facilitate executing application objects. The replication oflower-level hosting functionality across multiple hardware platformsprovides a degree of platform independence that enables relocating anapplication object without affecting the operation of the application.Thus, during stage 910 the user adds application object A to engine B ona different computer. During stage 912, the engine B initializes thenewly added application object A. The initialization stage 912 includes,for example, any custom initialization performed by an applicationobject before starting the application object (e.g., initialization ofclass variables, caching interfaces used by the application object,etc.). At stage 914, the engine B issues a start command to theapplication object A. At this point, the object assumes all of itsprimitives have been initialized and it can perform any initialcalculations based on the attributes maintained in these primitives.Engine B registers the executing application object A with a scheduler Bon the new computing platform during stage 916. Thereafter, at stage 918the scheduler B periodically prompts the application object A to executeits business logic. The results of executing application object A arerendered both locally and over a network connecting the engines. Thus,re-locating application object A to engine B does not affect data accessconcerning application object A.

Inter-Object Communications Via Message Exchange

In an embodiment of the present invention, the application objectsreference other objects by logical name rather than physical address.Thus, communications between application objects within a sameapplication, as far as the application objects are concerned, areinsulated from the underlying physical configuration of a networkcontaining the application object. A component of the application,referred to as message exchange, embedded within the platform and engineobjects enables application objects to retrieve (get) and send (set)data from/to other objects located anywhere within a network executingthe distributed application. Message exchange is a peer-to-peercommunication infrastructure that enables specifying a target by logicalname rather than physical network address. The application objects arethus permitted to carry out communications without regard to thephysical location of an intended recipient of a data request. This alsoenables the application object layer of an application to be developedwithout regard to where the application objects are ultimately deployed.In an embodiment of the invention, the message exchange is dividedbetween a local message exchange (LMX) carried out by an applicationengine and a network message exchange (NMX) carried out by a platform toenable named requests to be communicated between computing devicesconnected over a network for carrying out a distributed application. Inyet another embodiment of the invention, the LMX and NMX functionalityis carried out by the engines. This arrangement avoids extra,inter-process communications required in the event that the platformobject carries out NMX.

The LMX incorporated into the engine objects (e.g., application engineobjects) provides services enabling application objects to access datamaintained as attributes on other objects. When using LMX services toaccess target data, application objects specify a string representing apiece of data associated with an object (e.g., an attribute specified inthe form of “ObjectB.AttributeA”). With this string, LMX locates thedata associated with the object (potentially requesting NMX servicesprovided by the platform to access a target object located on anothercomputing device in a network). LMX returns the data, associated withthe object, to the application object that requested the data. Inaddition, the message exchange guarantees certification of messagedelivery. Therefore, when application objects send messages to otherapplication objects they receive confirmation that the target of themessage received or did not receive the message.

The LMX of the application engine includes, by way of example, a set ofinterfaces. The set of interfaces comprises: IMxSupervisoryConnectionand IMxUserConnection. The IMxSupervisoryConnection interface definesmethods used by application objects to access information from physicaldevices in a plant. The methods used on this interface comprise:SupervisoryRegisterReference, SupervisoryGetAttribute, andSupervisorySetAttribute. The SupervisoryRegisterReference method iscalled by application objects to inform message exchange that a requestto access a value of an attribute is forthcoming. TheSupervisorySetAttribute method is used by application objects to directmessage exchange to modify the value of the attribute specified in aprevious SupervisoryRegisterReference call. The SupervisoryGetAttributemethod is used by application objects to direct message exchange toretrieve the value of the attribute specified in a previousSupervisoryRegisterReference call.

The IMxUserConnection interface defines methods used by applications tovisualize data retrieved from physical devices in a plant. The methodsused on this interface comprise: UserRegisterReference,UserGetAttribute, and UserSetAttribute. These methods are very similarto the methods of the IMxSupervisoryConnection interface describedhereinabove. One difference is that the methods of the IMxUserConnectioninterface methods cater to user interface clients by allowing dataupdates via a callback mechanism instead of a polled mechanism utilizedby the IMxSupervisoryConnection.

A set of structures is utilized to carry out the functionality of themessage exchange. An MxReference structure is a MICROSOFT ComponentObject Model (COM) object that implements an interface IMxReference,identifies an attribute of an object whose value is to be accessed byapplication objects, and is passed into the methodsSupervisoryRegisterReference, and UserRegisterReference. TheMxReferenceHandle (an integer value) is used by message exchange toprovide application objects a location-transparent means of retrieving avalue referred to by an MxReference. The MxReferenceHandle is returnedto application objects by the message exchange on successful completionof a SupervisoryRegisterReference or UserRegisterReference call. TheMxReferenceHandle is passed in, by application objects, to method callsfor getting and setting attributes such as: UserSetAttribute,UserGetAttribute, SupervisorySetAttribute and SupervisoryGetAttribute.

An MxHandle structure identifies a property of an object's attribute.The MxHandle identifies a platform and an engine to which the objectbelongs. The MxHandle comprises two structures: anMxAutomationObjectHandle and an MxAttributeHandle. TheMxAutomationObjectHandle is the data structure used to represent thelocation of the object within the overall system. The MxAttributeHandledata structure is used to identify the property of an attribute withinthe object. The MxAttributeHandle structure is used, internally, bymessage exchange to quickly locate an attribute of an object.

The MxAutomationObjectHandle data structure includes five fields:galaxy, platform, engine, object, and signature. The galaxy fieldidentifies the general system to which the referenced object belongs. Aplatform field identifies the platform object with which the referencedobject is associated. An engine field identifies the object's engine. Anobject field identifies an object. A signature field stores a valuederived from the object's name and prevents configuration mismatchesthat can occur when an object is relocated.

The MxAttributeHandle data structure includes seven fields: primitiveID,attributeID, propertyID, index1, index2, index3 and signature. TheprimitiveID field identifies a primitive within an automation object. Aprimitive is a helper object that performs a specific operation in, forexample, an application object. The attributeID identifies a particularattribute within an identified primitive. A propertyID identifies aproperty of an attribute. Index fields 1, 2 and 3 provide indexes intoup to a three-dimensional array. A signature field stores a checksumvalue derived from the content of the MxAttributeHandle to preventconfiguration mismatches.

It is noted that the message exchange, in an embodiment of the presentinvention, includes additional data structures and interfaces. Suchadditional interfaces and structures will be known to those skilled inthe art. It is further noted that the present invention is not limitedto systems that utilize message exchange to provide ahardware/deployment independent messaging service for inter-objectcommunications for a set of application objects within a supervisoryprocess control and manufacturing information application.

Multiple Views/Late Binding of a Model to a Deployment

Another aspect of the proposed application architecture is thespecification of associations within objects. The associations,discussed herein below, enable a configuration component, referred toherein as the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) to filter anddisplay a set of related objects in a variety of views including atleast a (logical) model view and a (physical computing) deployment view.The IDE, through its displayed views of an application configuration,enables a user to design and deploy an application in a computer networkcomprising multiple computing devices.

The application configurations are stored as “packages” within theconfiguration database 124. A package framework subsystem provides aninterface enabling the IDE to store and retrieve the objects of thepackages. The package framework employs a relational database to storepackage data and knowledge regarding the objects'associations/relationships with other objects. The IDE queries thepackage framework to deliver a list of objects based on a designatedassociation with regard to an object. For example, the IDE can requestthe package framework to retrieve from a package the objects hosted by anamed engine.

A developer builds the aforementioned associations (or “relationships”)between objects via the IDE and package manager. Such associationsinclude, by way of example, the following pre-defined assignmentrelationships: host, area, container, engine and platform. Each of theserelationships is discussed herein below.

A host relationship is used at runtime to indicate where an objectexecutes. Furthermore, an object may not be deployed unless its host isdeployed. An application object is hosted by an area object, an areaobject is hosted by an engine object, and an engine object is hosted bya platform object. An area relationship establishes a logical groupingof objects and provides a means for collecting events and alarms raisedby objects grouped under the area. A container relationship specifies aloose coupling between two objects and is only meaningful in the contextof the application logic. Example: a Valve object contained inside of aTank object. Contained objects are allowed to acquire hierarchical nameswithin the context of the objects' container. By way of example, a valvethat acts as an inlet is assigned the alias “inlet” and receives thehierarchical name of “Tank.Inlet.” An object's engine is the actualengine that executes the object. An object's platform is the one andonly platform object running on a computer device upon which the objectis deployed. An object may have all five of these relationships, butonly one object may be associated to any one of these relationships. Forexample, an application object can be assigned to one and only one area.

A model view depicts the application in terms of logical associationsbetween plant/process equipment within a controlled plant process—e.g.,a representation of a physical plant layout. A deployment view depictsthe physical computer devices and assignment of instantiated objectsidentified in the model view to the computer devices and enginesexecuting upon the computer devices. A derivation view depicts thesources (inherited property relationships from base template toinstance) of objects instantiated from templates to carry out thefunctionality of the model view elements.

FIG. 1 shows, by way of example, an application physically deployed totwo application server computers 100 and 102. Alternatively, anapplication is presented to users by visually depicting the role ofapplication objects in carrying out supervisory process control and/orextracting manufacturing information according to the application.Turning now to FIG. 10 a plant process application is depicted, in aplant model, according to the roles of application objects in the plantprocess. This illustrative example is scaled down for purposes ofillustratively depicting an exemplary embodiment of the invention. Asthose skilled in the art will readily appreciate, the present inventionis applicable to a wide variety of industrial/plant monitoring/controlapplications that are far more complex than this example.

A hopper H1 1000 having a controlled outlet valve delivers raw productto a conveyor C1 1002 that is controllable to travel left, right, or bedisabled. The raw product is dumped by the conveyor C1 1002 into a mixerM1 1004 and a mixer M2 1006. The raw product is allowed to pass into themixers by opening valve V1 1012 and V2 1014 of mixer M1 1004 and mixerM2 1006, respectively. The mixer M1 1004 and mixer M2 1006 include acontrollable agitator A1 1008 and A2 1010 respectively. The mixedproduct drops into hoppers H2 1016 and H3 1018. The hoppers H2 1016 andH3 1018 are selectively opened to allow the mixed product to fall upon aconveyor C2 1020 that either travels right or is disabled. When enabled,the conveyer C2 1020 drops the mixed product onto an elevator E1 1022.The elevator E1 1022 deposits the mixed product onto a conveyer C3 1024that travels right. The conveyor C3 1024 deposits the material onto adistribution conveyor C4 1026 that is capable of traveling both left andright thereby distributing the mixed product between a first bi-statedoor D1 1028 and a second bi-state door D2 1030. The door D1 1028 iscontrollable to direct finished product into either bin B1 1032 or B21034. The door D2 1030 is controllable to direct finished product intoeither bin B3 1036 or bin B4 1038.

While the above-described process line depicted in FIG. 10 is simple,and thus relatively easy to follow, in most cases processes are verycomplex and include hundreds and even thousands of distinct, sensors andcontrolled components. In such instances, the application objectscorresponding to the sensors and controlled components are logicallygrouped within areas. The logical grouping of application objects isexploited during runtime to provide a uniform treatment of particularapplication objects for alarm and event management. For example, allalarms in a particular area can be disabled by a single attributedesignation within the area object. The compatibility of the host areaand hosted objects is determined by checking the “required hostfeatures” of the hosted object and the “supported features” specified bythe hosting area object. These object attributes are established whenthe objects are built. If the “required host features” are met by the“supported features,” then the host assignment is completed by assigningappropriate values to hosted objects. An object is placed within an areaby designating the area name in the area attribute 328 of the commonprimitive of an application or area object.

Areas themselves can be grouped within other areas in a hierarchicalarrangement. Assigning an area to another “host” area is accomplished,by way of example, by designating the name of the host area in the areaattribute 328 of the hosted area object. The relationship between areasand sub-areas are not constrained to execute on a same engine. Thus,sub-areas within an area can be assigned to different applicationengines when the application objects of a supervisory process controland manufacturing information application are deployed within a systemcomprising multiple platform objects (corresponding to multiple computerdevices) and engine objects. However, in an embodiment of the invention,application objects specified within a sub-area are restricted todeployment on a same application engine. This restriction ensures thatprocessing of all application objects in an area occurs withoutinter-node communication delays.

Area objects, by way of example, include the following attributes thatfacilitate the above-described functionality: alarm information, disableall alarms, disable the display of all alarms, sub-area list.

Turning to FIG. 11, logical grouping of related process components ofFIG. 10 into areas is demonstrated. The revised process illustrationdepicts the system as a series of areas comprising logically groupedcontrolled process components. A raw material store area 1100 includesthe hopper H1 1000. A production area 1102 includes the conveyor C11002, a line 1 area 1104 including the mixer M1 1004, valve V1 1012, andhopper H2 1016, and a line2 area 1106 including the mixer M2 1006, valveV2 1014, and hopper H3 1018. A distribution area 1108 includes theconveyor C2 1020, the elevator E1 1022, the conveyer C3 1024, conveyorC4 1026, bi-state door D1 1028 and bi-state door D2 1030. A finishedproduct store area 1110 includes bins B1 1032, B2 1034, B3 1036 and binB4 1038. The set of sub-areas are grouped under a single process plantarea 1120.

Having described an exemplary plant process and two alternative ways inwhich to view an application relating to the plant process (i.e., plantmodel and application object deployment views), a configuration utilityinterface is described that displays the application componentsaccording to these two alternative views. Turning briefly to FIG. 12, apartially completed model view user interface generated by aconfiguration utility depicts an area hierarchy represented in the formof a tree. The tree structure presents a high-level model view of theareas designated in a process plant depicted in FIG. 11. This model viewis incomplete since it does not identify the application objects groupedwithin the identified areas and containment relationships forapplication objects.

With reference to the exemplary tree structure, a process plant node1200 corresponding to the process plant area 1120 is designated at thehighest level of the hierarchical area representation. A set ofsecondary nodes, corresponding to sub-areas grouped within the processplant area 1120, branch from the process plant node 1200.RawMaterialStore node 1202, Production node 1204, Distribution node 1206and FinishedProductStore node 1208 correspond to the raw material storearea 1100, the production area 1102, a distribution area 1108 and afinished product store area 1110 respectively. A line 1 node 1210 and aline 2 node 1212 branching from Production node 1204 correspond to theline1 area 1104 and line2 area 1106 grouped within the production area1102 in FIG. 11. This view enables a technician to quickly identify andspecify logical groupings for defining policies governing applicationobjects such as alarming behaviors, etc.

Before describing an expanded version of the model view of FIG. 12identifying application objects and compounds within the identifiedareas, derivation of objects from templates is discussed. Each of thecomponents identified in FIG. 10 corresponds to an application object.In an embodiment of the invention, application objects are instantiatedfrom object templates. A derivation view represents all the types oftemplates from which application objects specified by a current modelfor an application are derived.

The set of candidate templates from which application objects arederived is extensible. Users are provided toolkits including basetemplates and editors to define customized new templates from which auser builds application objects. Examples of base templates (where $denotes a template) are: $DiscreteDevice—a state machine that isconfigurable to create an application object representing the mainconveyors and valves depicted in FIG. 10, and $UserDefined—a simpleobject template that contains only the common primitive, and from whichthe user builds extensions within the configuration environment byadding scripts and attributes to model the application objectscorresponding to the bins and hoppers.

Turning to FIG. 13, an exemplary derivation view rendered by aderivation view generated is illustratively depicted. With reference toFIG. 13, in the case of the example set forth in FIG. 10, the userderives from a $DiscreteDevice base template a $Valve, a $SliceGate, a$Agitator, and a $Conveyor custom application object template type.Under the $Conveyor template, the user further defines a$SingleDirectionConveyor, a $BiDirectionalConveyor, and an $Elevatortemplate type. Under a $UserDefined base template the user derived a$Vessel application object template. The $Vessel template is furtherrefined to derive a $Hopper and a $Bin application object. Withreference to FIG. 13, the base templates occupy the highest levels ofthe hierarchical derivation tree that is rendered by a configurationview generator based upon a user's designation of particular templates.Object templates derived from the base templates are identified bybranches leading from the base template nodes. As depicted in FIG. 13,it is possible to derive objects from other derived objects. In suchcases, the children inherit the designated characteristics of theirparent templates. The derivation relationship between a child and itsparent template is registered in the derived from attribute 314 of thetemplate object.

Application object containment (specified in container attribute 330 ofan application object), and the creation of compound object templatesfrom a set of previously defined object templates is another aspect ofthe template architecture disclosed herein. In an embodiment of theinvention, containment is limited to same object types. Thus, areaobjects can only contain area objects and application objects can onlycontain other application objects. Objects containing other objects arereferred to herein as “compounds.” Objects that exist solely to containother objects are referred to as “composites.”

Turning briefly to FIGS. 14 a and 14 b, an example is provided of acompound application object template—in this case a $MixerVesselcompound object template that includes a valve object that is assignedthe tag name “inlet”, an agitator that continues to carry the tag nameof “agitator,” and a mixer that has been assigned the tag name “vessel.”The contained name attribute 310 of the templates corresponding to eachof these three contained objects. The full hierarchical tag name (e.g.,MixerVessel.Inlet) is stored in the hierarchical name attribute 318 foreach of the three contained objects. The container attribute 330 foreach contained object is assigned the string “MixerVessel.” FIG. 14 aschematically depicts a portion of the process plant depicted in FIG. 10that contains a mixer vessel arrangement. A model view of the compoundtemplate showing the containment relationship between the $MixerVesselapplication object template and its contained (renamed) applicationobjects is depicted in FIG. 14 b. In an embodiment of the invention,when instantiated within an actual application, all application objectscontained within a compound application object designate a same host inattribute 338 (and by requirement a same area in attribute 328. Thiscontainment hierarchy, applicable to other objects as well (subject toany deployment restrictions), assists system developers in developingsystems by supporting the creation of logical building blocks(comprising many smaller application objects) from which applicationscan be built.

A “contain” function supported by the IDE, in an embodiment of thepresent invention, facilitates establishing containment relationshipsbetween objects via a graphical user interface “drag and drop”operation. To establish a containment relationship between a source andtarget (container) application object, a developer selects the sourceapplication object displayed on a user interface, drags the sourceapplication object on top of the target (container) object, and thendrops the source application object on the target application object.After the IDE confirms the compatibility between the two objects (i.e.,they are both application objects), the IDE (through the package managerutility) sets the host, area and container attributes in the sourceobject. In particular, the area attribute 328 is set to the targetobject's area, the host attribute 338 is set to the target's host, andthe container attribute 330 is set to the target object's name. At thispoint the contained name attribute 310 and the hierarchical nameattribute 318 of the source are also filled in with names provided bythe developer.

Returning to FIG. 13, the $MixerVessel compound application objecttemplate is assigned a branch under the $UserDefined base template nodeand specifies the contained relationships between the application objecttemplate elements of the compound. Furthermore, a $MixerVessel.Inlettemplate derived from $Valve is placed under the $Valve template node. A$MixerVessel.Vessel template derived from $Vessel is placed under the$Valve template node. A $MixerVessel.Agitator template derived from$Agitator is placed under the $Agitator template node. The containmentrelationship is registered by specifying the $MixerVessel templateobject in the container attribute 330 in each of the compound elements.The containment relationship is indicated in the derivation view tree ofFIG. 13 by a “$MixerVessel” preamble in the $MixerVessel.Inlet,$MixerVessel.Agitator, and $MixerVessel.Vessel object templaterepresentations within the derivation view tree.

Attribute locking and its effect upon change propagation in templatesare yet other aspects of the derivation architecture of the exemplaryconfiguration utilities disclosed herein. The derivation architectureenables information within an object template to be propagated toderived objects or alternatively a default value is specified for aderived template that can be overridden by a developer. In an embodimentof the invention, propagation is affected automatically by storing areference to a parent's copy of a locked attribute.

An attribute in a template or instance can be unlocked, locked inparent, or locked in me. Both templates and instances can have unlockedattributes. An unlocked attribute is read-write, and the object has itsown copy of the attribute value—i.e., it is not shared by derivedobjects. A template, but not an instance can have a locked in meattribute status. In the case of a locked in me attribute, the value isread-write. Derived objects do not get their own copy of the attributevalue, but instead share the locked value by reference to an ancestorwhere the attribute is locked. The status of the attribute in thechildren of a locked in me attribute is “locked in parent.” Thus,changes to the value of a locked in me template attribute propagate toall children. Both templates and instances can have a locked in parentattribute. A locked in parent attribute is read-only.

The interface for getting and setting a locked status of an attribute isexposed to configuration clients. The client obtains a reference to theattribute and sets its locked status. Whether a change to an attributeis permitted and/or propagated to derived children is based upon whethera particular attribute in a template is locked. Locking an attribute hastwo consequences. First, a locked in parent attribute cannot be modifiedin a derived template or instance. Second, a locked in me attribute in atemplate can be changed, and the change is cascaded down through alltemplates and instances derived from the template containing the lockedattribute. On the other hand, if an attribute is not locked, then theattribute specifies a default value that can be overridden in a derivedtemplate. Furthermore, if the value of a non-locked attribute ischanged, then the change is not cascaded to derived templates.

After establishing a set of templates that are to be used for theapplication objects identified in FIG. 10, the application objectinstances are created from the templates according to the proposedsupervisory process control and manufacturing information application.Using the templates defined in FIG. 13 and the exemplary process plantdepicted in FIG. 10 the following application objects are rendered:

$MixerVessel is used for Mixer M1 and M2;

$Hopper is used for Hopper H1, H2 and H2;

$SingleDirectionConveyor is used for conveyors C2 and C3;

$BiDirectionalConveyor is used for conveyors C1 and C4;

$SlideGate is used for Door D1 and D2; and

$Bin is used for Bins B1, B2, B3 and B4

Turning to FIG. 15, a hardware derivation view depicts the sources ofengine and platform objects from object templates. Such a view isbeneficial when deciding where to distribute or re-locate areas thathave particular engine and/or platform requirements. Node 1500corresponds to a WINDOWS operating system-based platform template. A setof platform instances, corresponding to platform objects derived fromthe WINDOWS operating system-based platform template, branch from node1500 and correspond to each of the personal computers identified inFIG. 1. Node 1510 corresponds to an application engine template. A setof application engine instances, derived from the application enginetemplate, branch from node 1510 and correspond to the applicationengines depicted in FIG. 1. Node 1520 corresponds to a view enginetemplate. A set of view engine instances branch from node 1520 andcorrespond to the view engines depicted in FIG. 1. Node 1530 correspondsto a PLCNetwork device integration object template. A set of instancesbranching from node 1530 correspond to device integration objectsidentified in FIG. 1 that support configuring the OPC servers 116 and118. Finally, node 1540 corresponds to a PLCObject device integrationobject template. A set of instances branching from node 1540 correspondsto device integration objects identified in FIG. 1.

FIG. 16 represents a model view of the process application depicted inFIGS. 10 and 11. The model view displays area hosting and containmentrelationships specified by objects (including application objects andareas). The model view identifies the objects that are logically groupedtogether for purposes of describing the plant layout. The model viewenables a user to quickly designate objects that will be treateduniformly under a particular policy (e.g., alarming, etc.). The modelview includes, by way of example, nodes corresponding to the areasdesignated in FIG. 11 and depicted in the area tree structure of FIG.12. The leaves of the tree 1600 identify the application objects andtheir assignments to the identified areas. Furthermore, the model viewtree depicts compound containers such as a set of compound containerobjects MV1 and MV2 instantiated from the $MixerVessel compound template(discussed above with reference to FIG. 13).

The model view is rendered by a model view generator based upon the areaand container attributes of the objects specified under a particularapplication. In an embodiment of the invention, the compatibility of anarea/container with a grouped/contained object is determined when a userseeks to create the association. This compatibility is determined bycomparing the support features of the parent object to the needs of thegrouped/contained child object. Furthermore, in an embodiment of theinvention all objects within a container are required to designate asame area.

Areas can be hierarchical. Thus, an area can include an area, and aparent area collects alarm statistics for all objects in its sub-areas.In a model view hierarchical tree structure depicted in FIG. 16,starting at the highest level of the tree structure, if no area isdesignated for an area object, then the area object (e.g., ProcessPlant1602) is connected directly to the root node (the highest level of thetree). At a next level, sub-areas of the ProcessPlant 1602 (i.e.,RawMaterialStore 1604, Production 1606, Distribution 1608 andFinishedProductStore 1610) are connected as branches under theProcessPlant 1602 node. In the exemplary application model tree 1600,the branches from the sub-areas contain application objects (i.e.,hopper H1, conveyors C1-C4, doors D1-D2, elevator E1, and bins B1-B4),and additional sub-areas (i.e., Line1 and Line 2 in the Production 1606sub-area). The Line1 and Line2 sub-areas both include compounds (i.e.,mixer vessels MV1 and MV2). The leaves of the compounds MV1 and MV2identify the objects contained by the compound objects. In theparticular example, the MixerVessel compound MV1 includes an agitatorA1, a vessel M1 and an inlet valve V1. The MixerVessel compound MV2includes an agitator A2, a vessel M1 and an inlet valve V1.

FIG. 17 represents an exemplary deployment view of the applicationmodel's areas to the hardware and platform depicted in FIG. 1. Thedeployment view visually depicts where the various objects of anapplication execute. A deployment view is therefore rendered based uponthe hosting (attribute 338) and the containment (attribute 330)relationships designated by objects. A child area object is notconstrained to execute upon the same application engine as a specifiedparent area (in attribute 328), and the area relationships designated byobjects are not applied when rendering the deployment view.ApplicationObjects are Hosted (attribute 338) by their area, thereforethe deployment view shows the ApplicationObject relationship to itsarea. Thus, the deployment view (and the actual deployment of nestedarea objects) does not reflect alarm/event concentration and propagationassociated with the hierarchical area model relationships designatedbetween area objects.

The application objects are not displayed in FIG. 17. However, adeployment view generator arranges the application objects underappropriate areas based upon the host/container designations withinthose objects. In an embodiment of the invention, an applicationobject's designated host and area are, by requirement, the same.Therefore, all application objects referencing an area object areexecuted upon a same engine object identified in the host attribute 338of the area object. This requirement ensures that alarms and datamaintained for application objects under a particular area aremaintained locally on a same computer device. If an application objectspecifies a container (compound application object) in attribute 330,then the named container overrides the named area host when generating adeployment view tree (i.e., an application object within a compound(container) is placed under its designated compound name). However, inan embodiment of the invention all application objects contained withina compound are constrained to execute upon a same host (i.e., allcontained application objects acquire the compound/container'sdesignated area).

The deployment view set forth in FIG. 17 is especially appropriatelyclassified as exemplary since the areas and their associated objects arecapable of running on any suitable platform/application enginecombination. The multi-layered platform/engine/area/application objecthosting arrangement renders the various areas (and their associatedapplication objects) capable of installation at any suitable hostingengine branch in the graphical representation of the deployment ofapplication components depicted in FIG. 17. The highest level of thedeployment tree hierarchy identifies a set of platforms corresponding tothe personal computers depicted in FIG. 1. The set of platformsrepresented by nodes include: a RawMaterialPC node 1700, a Production PCnode 1702, a FinishedProductPC node 1704, a ConfigurationPC node 1706,an ApplicationServer1PC node 1708, and an ApplicationServer2PC node1710.

A set of engines is deployed to the platform hosts. The set of deployedengine object nodes corresponding to engine objects hosted by theindicated platform objects includes: a RawMaterialView engine node 1712,a ProductionView engine node 1714, a FinishedProductView engine node1716, an AppEngine2 node 1718, and an AppEngine2 node 1720.

The engines host device integration and area groupings of applicationobjects that are represented in the deployment view as nodes. The set ofdevice integration object nodes corresponding to deployed deviceintegration objects includes PLC1Ethernet node 1722 and PLC1 node 1724,and PLC2Ethernet node 1726 and PLC2 node 1728. The set of area objectnodes corresponding to deployed areas comprising groups of applicationobjects and/or other areas includes a ProcessPlant node 1730, aRawMaterialStore node 1732, a Production node 1734, a Line1 node 1736, aLine2 node 1738, a Distribution node 1740 and a FinishedProductStorenode 1742. The branches connecting the above-identified area nodes totheir associated engines corresponds to the engines designated in thehost attribute 338 in the area objects and their associated applicationobjects that, for the sake of avoiding undue clutter, are omitted fromthe deployment view set forth in FIG. 17.

The IDE and Using Object Templates to Create an Application

Having described the architecture of an exemplary supervisory processcontrol and manufacturing information application, attention is nowdirected to design toolkits and configuration interfaces that facilitatequick and efficient development of such applications. Two aims of thedesign environment are transparency and re-usability. In-essence, adeveloper should not have to learn complex software coding underlyingdesired functional capabilities embodied within application object. Norshould a developer have to start from scratch each time a new type ofcontrol or monitoring operation is needed. Both aims are addressed inthe disclosed template-based design environment.

The application objects defining the functionality of a supervisoryprocess control and manufacturing information application areinstantiated from previously defined templates. The templates exhibit anumber of desirable behaviors. The templates incorporate an inheritancebehavior between a parent template and a child template derived from theparent. For example, a generic “$DiscreteDevice” template is customizedby a control engineer to create domain-specific “valve,” “motor,” and“pump” templates. In an embodiment of the invention, customization of ageneric $DiscreteDevice template into domain-specific “valve”, “motor”,and “pump” templates is performed through the IDE, and only within theIDE. The template creation procedure is graphical user interface drivenand thus the end user simply points to the generic template and thenissues a command via a menu option called “Create Template”. The resultis that a new template is created and is “based on” the generictemplate. The new template inherits its functionality from the generictemplate. Thereafter, the user configures the custom template toidentify a specific object of interest. For example, a motor's statesconsist of “on” and “off”—so those states are named, and a state countis set to two. Next, the motor-specific values are locked in the motortemplate. Any template instances that are further derived from the motortemplate inherit these motor-like qualities. Because the motor qualities(attributes) are locked in the motor template, the values cannot bechanged in the descendents. The domain-specific templates are then usedany time an application object is needed for any of these three devices.

In an embodiment of the invention, application object templates arecapable of specifying associated graphics. Such graphics include, by wayof example, windows, symbols, animation and navigation links. Theassociated graphics can persist in child templates as well as the objectinstances derived from the customized templates.

Templates also possess the potential to exercise a containment behavior.A template is capable of containing other templates, thereby enablinglarge object templates to be created from a set of smaller ones. Forexample, a reactor template contains a drain valve, a level indicator, asteam jacket, and an agitator application object. A locking behavior,described in detail hereinabove with reference to FIGS. 13, 14 a and 14b, is yet another desirable behavior provided by the templates in anembodiment of the present invention. Locking forces all children of alocked parent template to carry a same value as the locked attribute.

The IDE provides access by developers to a template library including aset of previously defined object templates including application objecttemplates. From a graphical user interface, such as the one depicted inFIG. 18 a developer specifies objects to be instantiated from the set oftemplates and thereafter edits fields of the selected templates tocreate derived templates and designate attributes of objects to beinstantiated from the original and derived object templates. Thereafter,objects, including application objects that define the operation of aplant process, are instantiated from the templates.

With reference to FIG. 18, the various available object templates aredisplayed within a Template Toolbox window 1800. In contrast to FIG. 13,the disclosed tree structure discloses containment, but it does notdepict the derivation relationships between templates. Each templatetoolset (e.g., CoreApplication Objects, Template Toolset2, TemplateToolset3) is displayed as a root node. The first level below a roottoolset nodes includes the simple templates and the names of compound(container) templates arranged alphabetically. The compound template$Tank is expanded to show the objects contained within it (i.e.Agitator, Inlet, Level, Outlet, and Pump).

Having described the template-based design environment embodied in anexemplary configuration utility, attention is directed to a source ofnew object templates utilized by the above described IDE to render childtemplates and application objects—referred to herein as “objecttoolkits.” The object toolkits provide developers with the ability tocreate custom application object templates. The custom object templatesare then imported into the configuration database 124, configured in theIDE, and deployed to an application engine. The object toolkits alsoenable the creation of platform, engine, and primitive templates.Furthermore, a license provision is provided to third parties enablingthem to create customized templates without infringing intellectualproperty rights in the original templates.

As an initial matter a general shape of an object template is depictedin FIG. 19. As depicted in FIG. 19, objects comprise a set of one ormore primitives. Primitives are logical, generally reusable, buildingblocks of objects. Furthermore, primitives can be concrete (i.e., theyexist within an instance of an object), virtual (i.e., they exist astemplates to create concrete primitives, or utility (i.e., they are usedby an object or primitive developer to add functionality to the objector primitive such as alarming, history, input, output, output withfeedback, etc.). Virtual primitives are used when it is uncertain howmay primitives of the specified type will be needed by the object whenit is configured. The number is fixed when an object instance isdeployed. The primitives expose attributes and properties, and defineassociated behavior. In an embodiment of the invention, each object hasa common primitive 1900 (see, FIG. 3 described herein above). Asdisclosed previously herein above, the object type (e.g., platformobject, application object, area object, etc), and the object's uniquecapabilities are defined in one or more additional custom primitivessuch as Top Custom Primitive 1902. A Utility Primitive 1904 (one of aset of pre-fabricated primitives provided with the toolkit) is alsoincluded under the Top Custom Primitive 1902. Each of the primitivesincludes a set of attributes and properties (e.g., attributes 1906,1908, 1910, 1912, and properties 1914). However, the attributes andproperties of the Common Primitive 1900 and Utility Primitive 1904 areomitted in the drawing. In an embodiment of the invention, theproperties are hard-coded (the list of properties for a particularattribute are fixed) and therefore need not be named. There is nolimitation on the organization of the primitives within an object. Anobject can include multiple independent and/or interacting primitives ofany of the above types.

Also, while not shown in the component summary of an object depicted inFIG. 19, the runtime version of an object includes an object base. Theobject base creates and initializes the object primitives duringruntime. The object base thereafter is responsible for routing calls tothe appropriate primitive (with the aid of a primitive table identifyingits primitives and a primitive ID within the handle included in therequest), and more generally the object base is responsible for routingcalls from the message exchange to appropriate components of the object.The runtime embodiment of the object includes an attribute tablecomponent comprising: support for checkpointing, support forpublishing/subscribing, attribute MxHandles, references to attributeswithin custom code. Similarly, attribute definitions in an attributedefinition structure guide the creation of attribute table entries whenthe attribute table is instantiated.

Turning now to FIG. 20, a set of blocks depict the functional componentsof a toolkit 2000. The toolkit 2000 includes interface componentdefinitions 2002, components 2004, and utilities 2006. The interfacedefinitions 2002 include a Configuration (editor) Interface 2010, aRuntime Interface 2012, and Package Interface 2014. The set of interfacedefinitions 2002 enable a single object to provide useful interactionwith a variety of environments (e.g., editing, validation, runtime,etc.). The Configuration Interface 2010 supports a set of methodsenabling an object's configuration to be edited by the IDE. The PackageInterface 2014 supports a set of methods enabling the object to bepackaged and then imported, exported, uploaded, downloaded, copied,and/or stored within the configuration database 124.

Attributes are the portions of an object that are accessible by messageexchange. They generally are classified as configuration (set at thetime of configuration) and state (set during runtime). The RuntimeInterface 2012 supports a set of methods executed on identifiedattributes that provide behaviors to the object during runtime when anobject is deployed on a host application engine. The runtime interface2012 comprises a GetAttribute and a SetAttribute method enabling otherobjects to access exposed attributes on the object. A GetAttribute callincludes the following inputs: attribute handle, access level (forsecurity), and locale ID (for localizing language). The GetAttributecall returns the requested data and quality of the data. TheSetAttribute method is used to set a value and/or invoke an action bythe object (a pseudo-remote procedure call. The SetAttribute callincludes the following inputs: attribute handle, confirmation handle,write type, access level, access level verifier, data in. TheSetAttribute call returns an optional response value. Other exemplarymethods include lifetime commands: an initialize command issued by anapplication engine to an object to inform the object of its assigned IDand passes any required interfaces and a close command called by theapplication engine to shut the object thread down. After initializing, ascheduler periodically invokes operation of the object via an executecommand. A data publisher on LMX issues calls to a subscribe andunsubscribe method to commence and discontinue providing particularattribute data without requiring further get commands to the object. Agetsubscriptiondata call returns a list of all attributes that havechanged since getsubscriptiondata was last called. A getcheckpointdatacall returns a list of all attributes that have changed since the lasttime the method was called. Lost data can be restored from thecheckpoint via a call to BeginRestore. EndRestore identifies when therestoration is complete. A BindLocalHandle call resolves a request by anapplication engine to provide an object's handle (MxHandle). It is notedthat the above-described methods are merely exemplary. Those skilled inthe art will readily appreciate that the set of methods executed onattributes can be extended in accordance with other embodiments of theinvention.

The utilities 2006 support the object template development process. AnObject Designer 2020 is a graphical utility that enables a developer todevelop new objects and primitives for objects. A developer, through theObject Designer 2020, specifies primitives and attributes within anobject or primitive. The Object Designer 2020 facilitates configuring anobject template's attributes, specifying supporting primitives(including the utility primitives identified herein above), andconfiguring the attributes of the associated primitives. The ObjectDesigner 2020, in addition to allowing attribute values to be specified,allows totally new attributes to be defined.

In an embodiment of the invention, the Object Designer 2020 supports abasic mode and advanced mode. The basic mode facilitates creatingapplication objects comprising the common primitive, a custom primitive,and utility primitives. The advanced mode facilitates creating newprimitives, or a hierarchy of primitives, and/or an object comprising ahierarchy of primitives. The object designer also enables a user tolaunch a code wizard that generates skeleton code for a primitive.

A set of code wizards 2024 generate source code for a specified targetlanguage based upon an object or primitive definition rendered by theObject Designer 2020. Resulting wrapper classes for the object willexpose the object as being defined in the target language. In the caseof C++ code, an attribute class is provided and a custom object classcontaining attributes are generated. The attributed class containsassignment and casting operators that allow appropriate rows within theattribute table to be accessed when the wrapper class's attributes areaccessed. In the case of Visual Basic code, an attribute class isprovided and a customer object class containing attributes is generated.The attribute class contains Get and Set Property routines that accessthe proper row of an attribute table.

The code wizards 2024 generate a set of output components correspondingto the supplied object or primitive definition. A set of include filesare generated to enable a developer to access primitive attributes byname rather than internal identification. A runtime code shell generatedby the code wizards 2024 lays out the framework for all code required bythe object during runtime. Exemplary entries specify code for thefollowing methods supported by an object: execute, startup, onscan,offscan, and shutdown. A package code shell generated by the codewizards 2024 lays out the framework for methods that are needed tointeract with the configuration database 124. A custom editor code shellgenerated by the code wizards 2024 provides a user interface forspecifying the contents of a file that supplies the content for aneditor to display to a user when configuring the object/primitive viathe IDE.

A test container 2026 provides testing, debugging and diagnosticscapabilities for any one of the Runtime, Package, or Editor componentsof a primitive or object defined and coded in the toolkit designenvironment. Object attributes are set and values are retrieved andlogged.

An import file packager 2028 creates an import file from the codemodules and attribute data specified when the object was defined. Theresulting import file contains the template package representing thenewly defined object class as well as template packages representing allprimitives that were configured and used within the packaged object. Thetemplate package includes the binary code, a dictionary file, and anobject's definition. In an embodiment of the invention, primitives canbe packaged within object packages, but cannot be imported bythemselves.

The components 2004 comprise the various pieces of data and code fromwhich the object is created. A base object 2030 is a base objecttemplate selected by a user from a set of available class-specific baseobjects. A set of primitives 2032 are provided from which a user selectsparticular ones that are included in the object. When a user selects aparticular primitive for inclusion in the object, a row is created in anattribute table for the object for each contained attribute. Eachprimitive can be extended through the designation of script primitivesand user defined attributes.

The set of primitives 2032 includes the set of utility primitives (e.g.,input, output, output with feedback, alarm, history, etc.) mentionedpreviously above. The input/output primitives are utilized to transferdata between the object and other objects via message exchange. Theinput/output primitives encapsulate the details of message exchange andname binding services (e.g., providing a location-specific handle for anamed object). Primitives for alarms, events and historizationfacilitate uniform handling of these activities in a runtimeenvironment. The set of primitives 2032 also includes script primitivesthat handle the details of extending an object's functionality throughthe inclusion of one or more scripts hosted by the object. User definedattribute primitives enable users, through the IDE, to add attributesthat were not specified during the object design stage using thetoolkit. These attributes are referenced from scripts, but cannot bereferenced by the custom code created during the design stage using thetoolkits. The set of extension primitives is not limited to scripting oruser defined attributes and can be extended to cover extending existingattributes (e.g. Input Extension, History Extension, etc.)

An object is also includes editor components. A base object editor 2034provides standard editor pages common to all objects. Custom editorpages 2036 provide editor pages for the customized portions of an objectdefinition.

Having described components of an exemplary object design andimplementation toolkit and objects created from the exemplary toolkit,attention is now directed to a exemplary sequence of steps performed bya developer to create new primitives and objects through the exemplarytoolkit. With reference to FIG. 21, a set of exemplary steps summarizethe general workflow of a developer to create a new basic applicationobject in the basic mode of operation of the toolkit's Object Designer2020. The summarized sequence of steps are commenced when the developerchooses an option at the top-level of a set of toolkit screens to createa new application object template. In response, during step 2100 theObject Designer 2020 creates a new template in memory. During step 2102a definition pane is rendered to prompt the developer to enter thefollowing identifications for the template: template name, vendor(developer's business name), toolset name (IDE toolset name under whichthe new template will be placed—see, FIG. 18, short description, GUID(serves as the major version of the template), minor version. Thecategory “application object” and required host “area” are automaticallygenerated when the application object is created.

During step 2104 attributes are added to the template. For eachattribute the developer specifies one or more of the following supporteddescriptors:

-   -   Name    -   Data Type—in the case of an enumeration field, the developer        specifies an attribute holding the array of strings upon which        the enumeration is based    -   Attribute Category—whether the attribute is readable/writeable        at configuration/runtime, whether it needs to be deployed    -   Initial Attribute Value    -   Attribute Quality calculation capability    -   Default Security Classification    -   Whether the attribute has a handler for set commands at        configuration/runtime    -   Alarmed—whether the attribute supports alarms, and if yes, then        the attributes of the alarm    -   Historized—whether the attribute can be historized    -   Has Quality—a flag indicating whether the attribute has an        associated data quality calculated at runtime    -   Frequently Accessed—a flag notifying browsers in situations        where attributes are filtered    -   Define a default attribute for the object by creating a .PV        named attribute

Next, during step 2106, the developer, through the Object Designer 1024graphical user interface selects ones of the input, output, and outputwith feedback primitives that are to be included in the new applicationobject template. For each primitive specified during step 2106, thedeveloper specifies a name and properties (e.g., data type). Theprimitive at this point is designated as a virtual primitive if desired.If virtual, then the developer is also responsible for programming thecode to load/unload the primitive at configuration time. Input andoutput primitives are displayed on the Object Designer 1024's renderingof the object under construction as new attributes. They are notconnected to existing attributes.

During step 2108 the developer invokes a save operation on the ObjectDesigner 1024 interface, and an object file is stored containing theshape of the object—e.g., the component configuration including, forexample, name, list of attributes and initial values, execution group,names of associated code modules, and embedded primitives.

Thereafter, during step 2110 one of the coding wizards 1026 (e.g., a C++wizard) is invoked to create an editor component, package component, andruntime component of the top custom primitive. In an embodiment of theinvention, separate code modules are created for each of the threecomponents of the custom primitive—and all primitives. The activatedcoding wizard also fills associated files in an implementation detailssection of the application object template.

Next, during step 2112 the developer specifies editor elements relatingto the configurable portions of the template. In response, a customconfiguration editor file is created. During step 2114 the developeradds any desired entries to the dictionary file (forinternationalization) by directly editing such file.

During step 2116 the developer supplies custom code incorporated intothe skeleton code generated by the wizard during step 2110 for thepackage and runtime components of the application object template.During step 2118 the application object template is packaged in a filenamed by the developer. Thereafter, the packaged template is ready to beimported into the configuration database 124. Upon completion, filesexist that define the new application object template (e.g. object shapefile, numerous code files.).

In addition to the above-described scenario, the disclosed developmenttoolkit environment supports a number of different design scenarios. Inan advanced mode of operation, the toolkits are capable of re-usingpreviously defined custom templates to generate other applicationobjects. In this case, a previously defined custom primitive isretrieved by the Object Designer 2020 after creating an objecthierarchy. Thereafter, the attributes and embedded primitives areconfigured and the remaining steps 2108 to 2118 are performed asdescribed above.

In an advanced mode, a developer can define a new primitive comprisingattributes and potentially other primitives. Such primitive packages areadvantageously incorporated into complex hierarchical objects comprisingmultiple primitives that either, on their own, or together can beapplication objects. An example is an analog input primitive that canexist as an application object, or alternatively be incorporated into adrive or pump application object. Initially, the developer specifies aprimitive hierarchy. Thereafter, the developer specifies attributes forthe primitive. The developer also specifies input/output, alarms, andhistory characteristics for the primitive. The shape of the newprimitive is saved. A coding wizard is applied to the primitive shape torender skeleton code for the primitive. The skeleton code is augmentedby the developer and projects are built based upon the resultingtemplate structures. A template file is then created and stored in thetoolkits for use in creating other primitives and advanced applicationobjects.

Creating an application object template in advanced mode introducesgreater flexibility in defining the content of the object. Afterlaunching the Object Designer 2020 and inputting a template definition,the developer designates previously defined and stored primitivedefinition files into an application object hierarchy. If the primitiveis virtual, then the developer provides package component code thatloads the primitive at configuration time when needed. The developer isable to override previously specified attribute properties (e.g., value,security classification, lock status, etc.). After performing previouslydescribed code generation and editing steps, the object is packaged forimport to the configuration database 124.

It is noted that while the discussion herein above has focused primarilyupon creating application objects through the toolkit. In an embodimentof the invention, the toolkit is not limited to creating applicationobject templates and its capabilities extend to all automation objects(e.g., platforms, engines, device integration objects, etc.).

Having described a flexible design environment for extending thefunctionality of applications through defining new objects, anextensible process control and manufacturing information applicationdevelopment and execution package/suite is disclosed. A method formarketing the OEM/third party developer customizable package/suite isalso described herein below.

Turning first to FIG. 22, a set of extensible components are disclosedthat contribute to the overall ability of third parties to modify a basesuite and then re-package and market the modified base development andexecution suite to particular customer sectors. An object design toolkit2200, described in detail herein above, enables third party developersto create new object templates that are developed to provide specificvertical market functionality. The ability to create new objects andderive templates from previously existing templates includes applicationobjects, engine objects, and platform objects—objects that are allcreated from a common object toolkit available to developers. Theobjects created by the OEM, once imported into the application, areprocessed in the same way as base objects. Thereby providing a seamlessintegration environment.

By way of example, processes used in food industry have special controlsfor food processing equipment that is unique to the food processingindustry. An OEM having particular knowledge of the supervisory controland manufacturing information needs for the food processing industrycreates a set of new templates (both new base templates and derivedtemplates) that address the unique processing equipment and associatedcontrol needs. The OEM then markets and distributes the modified basepackage as a food processing package. Alternatively, the OEM will marketto even more particular vertical markets by offerings such as a “dairy”package, or “bakery” package that are derived from the base developmentand execution suite with the aid of the above described object designtoolkit.

Furthermore, an OEM may identify a need to modify an existing objectprovided within the base development and execution suite. The need canarise that they wish to add vertical market extensions to the existingobjects created from the object design toolkit 2200 for which they donot own the source code. In an embodiment of the invention the basesystem provides an object customization editor 2202, which furnishes aset of extensible customization tools. This is accessible within the IDEor configuration database toolkit 2203.

Another aspect of the disclosed system that facilitates an OEM creatinga vertical market solution is a configuration database toolkit 2203 thatexposes all of the configuration capabilities of the IDE viaprogrammatic interfaces. These interfaces can be used to create specificdevelopment tools targeted specifically to the configurationrequirements of the vertical market. These tools can be used tosupplement the IDE functionality or if required totally replace it.

Another area that facilitates secondary development of a basedevelopment and execution suite by third parties is modifiable customersoftware package documentation 2204. In an embodiment of the invention,the help, instruction, and example documentation is extensible, therebyenabling OEMs to add/modify the documentation for the object designtoolkit and the IDE to address the modifications to thoseextensible/modifiable components of the overall system provided tocustomers and developers. Modifiable components of the help for the IDE,where a user configures an application, include the basic concepts, suchas: what an object is and what types of objects exist the differencebetween a template and an instance; template toolset and operationsallowed on a template; application views such as model, deployment andderivation and there uses; the basic process of building an application;operational descriptions such as derivation, instance creation,assignment, deployment, OnScan, etc.; and Security.

Furthermore, in cases where the suite is directed to OEMs, brand andmanufacturer names are provided in the form of place holders linked toconfigurable input text strings. The document styles are alsoconfigurable. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the OEM usesFRAMEMAKER and WEBWORKS publisher to customize the documentation.

Furthermore, in an embodiment of the invention the Help documentation ismodified within the IDE. By navigating to the Object editor within theIDE and selecting the object help field a developer reviews the HTMLfile describing how to use the object, and the help will be available tousers who have derived templates or instances from this object. If nospecific help has been provided for this object the system requests helpfrom a Web server-based database containing the template for the object.

The developer can provide specific help for this object by launching ahelp editor from within the objects editor, the initial file is based onthe object's template help. The developer can change the file untilsatisfied with the description of the object and then saves and checksin the object. The help file presented will be that of the languagechosen by the user for the current client session. To edit otherlanguages from within the editor the user must change the clientlanguage.

Yet another extensible component contributing to the enhanced ability ofOEMs to create vertical market-specific development and execution suitesfrom a base suite is a message exchange toolkit 2206. The messageexchange toolkit provides the needed interface for a third partydeveloper to integrate external application directly into the runtimenamespace by communicating directly via the message exchangepeer-to-peer inter-object communication protocol incorporated into theillustrative embodiment of the present invention. The resulting externalapplication appears to others to be an engine object in the sense thatit can communicate via the message exchange protocols. However, theintegrated external application created via the message exchange toolkitis not constrained to meet the hosting requirements and associatedoperational requirements of those objects that are created via theObject Toolkit 2200. The only constraint is that there is a platformpresent to enable the message exchange communications.

Yet another modifiable component is an installation sequence anddirectory editor 2208. Such modifications enable the OEMs to give theinstalled product a look and feel that is unique to the OEMs instead ofthe supplier of the base package. Thus, provision is made for thecustomization of the overall splash screen. The splash screen willprovide for the customization of: main CD splash image, company logoimage, text description, and background color. In an embodiment of theinvention, it is possible to customize an install without requiring abuild of the system. This allows customization of the product to fit themarketing needs of the OEMs. The customization will provide for:replacement of any screen text relating to the background, replacementof any screen images, modifying locations of screen images, modifyingthe size of screen images, and displaying license text. OEMs will beable to add command files to process additional install functions. Theproduct license text is also customizable.

Having described a set of extensible components that enhance the abilityof third parties (e.g., OEMs) to create vertical market-specificversions of a base offering, attention is now directed to a summary ofthe steps performed in such a business arrangement intended to increasethe breadth of market penetration by the disclosed process control andmanufacturing information application development and execution suite.During step 2300 the original developer of the base suite establishesdistribution arrangements with a set of third party developers (e.g.,OEMs). Such agreements can be in the form of ordinary seller/purchaserarrangements with appropriate licensing arrangements concerningownership and intellectual property rights. The independent developersare thus provided access to an extensible base development and executionsoftware suite including the above-described extensible components setforth in FIG. 22. Using the object design toolkit, the third partydevelopers access and edit a set of base object templates. The objectsderived from the object design toolkit include at least applicationobjects deployed upon lower level hosting component objects of asupervisory process control and manufacturing information application.However, the object design toolkit supports the third party developmentof engine and platform objects also. Furthermore, the design toolkitincludes development tools (described above) enabling the third partiesto create new base object templates that are added as extensions of theset of base object templates.

In addition to enabling the third parties to change the operationalcapabilities of the base suite, in an embodiment of the invention thirdparty developers are provided marketing package customization toolsfacilitating seamlessly integrating changes by developers to theextensible base development and execution software suite. Such toolsinclude, by way of example, electronically editable base userdocumentation facilitating supplementation in accordance withmodifications by developers to the extensible base development andexecution software package.

During step 2302 the third parties, exploiting the extensible componentsdescribed above with regard to FIG. 22, develop extended versions of thebase development and execution software suite. The third parties applydomain-specific knowledge relating to particular vertical markets to thebase offerings received during step 2300. The new software componentsadded to the base offerings include at least new object templates fromwhich end users in particular vertical markets can instantiatedomain-specific objects when configuring an application.

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention the offeringsby third parties to customers, during step 2304, are identifiedprimarily as the third parties' own offering rather than the originaldeveloper's. Such “branding” extends to install screens, splash screens,etc. Also, the help and other documentation is tailored by the thirdparties.

After obtaining the vertical market version of the applicationdevelopment and execution suite, the customers install the software,configure an application by means of the modified toolkits anddocumentation, and deploy their configured applications on a supervisoryprocess control and manufacturing information system such as the onedepicted in FIG. 1.

Illustrative embodiments of the present invention and certain variationsthereof have been provided in the Figures and accompanying writtendescription. The present invention is not intended to be limited tothese embodiments. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the artthat a new and useful extensible configuration and development facilityhas been described for not only rendering supervisory process controland manufacturing information applications, but also a modifiablepackage that enables OEMs and other third party developers to augment abase development and execution suite (and associated documentation) andmarket the extended version to particular vertical market customers. Inview of the many possible environments to which the principles of thisinvention may be applied and the flexibility of designing and carryingout software-based systems, it should be recognized that the embodimentsdescribed herein are meant to be illustrative and should not be taken aslimiting the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art to whichthe present invention applies will appreciate that the illustratedembodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departingfrom the spirit of the invention. The present invention is intended tocover the disclosed embodiments as well as others falling within thescope and spirit of the invention to the fullest extent permitted inview of this disclosure and the inventions defined by the claimsappended herein below. Therefore, the invention as described hereincontemplates all such embodiments as may come within the scope of thefollowing claims and equivalents thereof.

1. A physical computer-readable medium including computer-executableinstructions comprising an extensible base process informationapplication development and execution software suite comprising: anobject design toolkit including: object template derivation tools foraccessing and editing a set of base object templates, wherein objecttemplates derived from the base object templates include at leastapplication object templates from which application objects are createdand deployed to computer systems containing lower level hostingcomponent objects for hosting the application objects in a supervisoryprocess control and manufacturing information application, anddevelopment tools for creating new base object templates that are addedas extensions of the set of base object templates; and a set ofmarketing package customization tools facilitating integrating changesto the extensible base process information application development andexecution software suite including: electronically editable base userdocumentation facilitating supplementation in accordance withmodifications to the extensible base process information applicationdevelopment and execution software suite.
 2. The physicalcomputer-readable medium of claim 1 wherein the extensible base processinformation application development and execution software suite furthercomprises: an installation sequence and directory editor enablingcustomization of install sequences and startup user interfaces.
 3. Thephysical computer-readable medium of claim 1 wherein the extensible baseprocess information application development and execution software suitefurther comprises: an integrated development environment customizationtoolkit enabling modifications by developers to a set of applicationconfiguration tools presented to customers while configuring anapplication in the integrated development environment.
 4. The physicalcomputer-readable medium of claim 1 wherein the development tools forcreating new base object templates includes a common primitive thataddresses underlying requirements of all objects of a particular class.5. The physical computer-readable medium of claim 4 wherein the commonprimitive includes a common security component.
 6. The physicalcomputer-readable medium of claim 4 wherein the common primitiveincludes a common communications component.
 7. The physicalcomputer-readable medium of claim 4 wherein the object design toolkitprovides a shell for a new object template including at least the commonprimitive and a slot for a customized executable extension establishingthe execution behavior of objects instantiated from the new objecttemplate.
 8. The physical computer-readable medium of claim 7 whereinthe object design toolkit includes input and output primitives.
 9. Thephysical computer-readable medium of claim 7 wherein the object designtoolkit includes an alarm primitive.
 10. The physical computer-readablemedium of claim 1 wherein the electronically editable base userdocumentation includes help documentation.
 11. The physicalcomputer-readable medium of claim 1 wherein the extensible base processinformation application development and execution software suite furthercomprises: a communications toolkit including a base primitive includinga communications component facilitating communications with objectsaccording to a protocol adopted for inter-object communications indistributed applications created from the extensible base developmentand execution software suite.
 12. The physical computer-readable mediumof claim 11 wherein the communications toolkit is a peer-to-peer messageexchange-based protocol toolkit.
 13. The physical computer-readablemedium of claim 1 wherein the extensible base process informationapplication development and execution software suite further comprises:development tools to modify a configuration environment.
 14. A methodfor distributing a supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation application development and execution software suite throughintermediate development houses, the method comprising the steps of:first distributing an extensible base process information applicationdevelopment and execution software suite, stored on a physical computerreadable medium, the software suite comprising: an object design toolkitincluding: object template derivation tools for accessing and editing aset of base object templates, wherein object templates derived from thebase object templates include at least application object templates fromwhich application objects are created and deployed to computer systemscontaining lower level hosting component objects for hosting theapplication objects in a supervisory process control and manufacturinginformation application, and development tools for creating new baseobject templates that are added as extensions of the set of base objecttemplates; and a set of marketing package customization toolsfacilitating integrating changes to the extensible base processinformation application development and execution software suiteincluding: electronically editable base user documentation facilitatingsupplementation in accordance with modifications to the extensible baseprocess information application development and execution softwaresuite; developing an extended version of the extensible base processinformation application development and execution software suite, theextended version containing new software components, the new softwarecomponents including at least new object templates; and seconddistributing the extended version of the extensible base processinformation application development and execution software suite. 15.The method of claim 14 wherein the developing step comprises applyingvertical market-specific customizations to the base process informationapplication development and execution software suite.
 16. The method ofclaim 14 wherein the development step comprises deriving a custom objecttemplate from one of the set of base object templates.
 17. The method ofclaim 14 wherein the extensible base process information applicationdevelopment and execution software suite further comprises: aninstallation sequence and directory editor enabling customization ofinstall sequences and startup user interfaces.
 18. The method of claim14 wherein the development tools for creating new base object templatesincludes a common primitive that addresses underlying requirements ofall objects of a particular class.
 19. The method of claim 14 whereinthe extensible base process information application development andexecution software suite further comprises: a communications toolkitincluding a base primitive including a communications componentfacilitating communications with objects according to a protocol adoptedfor inter-object communications in distributed applications created fromthe extensible base process information application development andexecution software suite.
 20. The method of claim 14 wherein theextensible base process information application development andexecution software suite further comprises: development tools to modifya configuration environment.